Capable Teacher, Myopic Scorer: Reward-Free Teacher Repair for Agentic On-Policy Distillation

Preprint 2026
Shu Zhao, Tan Yu
NVIDIA
(a) The teacher's token scores let the student's delaying thoughts pass and the episode runs out of turns, while the teacher's own takeover from the same state completes the task. (b) R2S: with a selected takeover in context the teacher scores the delay lower; a copy is fine-tuned offline to do so without the takeover and becomes the OPD scorer.

OPD can reinforce the delays its teacher lets pass. (a) The teacher's scores let delaying thoughts pass and the episode runs out of turns; its own takeover from that state finishes. (b) With the takeover in context, the teacher scores the delay lower; R2S trains a copy to do so without it.

Abstract

Agentic on-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student agent on its own trajectories while a teacher scores every token. A natural explanation of where it goes wrong is compounding error: the student's mistakes carry its trajectories beyond the region where the teacher is reliable, so recent methods keep training inside that region, through episode-length curricula, teacher-guided turns, prefix replay, or teacher intervention where the two disagree. We show this explanation is incomplete. From the states where the student departs most from the teacher, the teacher's own takeovers still finish the task, yet the student trained on its token scores keeps running out of turns. We attribute this to the myopia of next-token scoring. The teacher rates each token without seeing where the episode ends, so its scores let through the safe, delaying moves that outcome-based RL would punish with zero reward, a penalty agentic OPD lacks. We call this difference between what the teacher does and what it scores the rollout–scorer gap. We propose Rollout-to-Scorer Distillation (R2S), which repairs the scorer before distillation by mining high-disagreement states from the untrained student, running teacher takeovers from them, keeping the states where enough takeovers pass a reward-free check such as consensus or an LLM judge, and fine-tuning the teacher to give its takeover-informed scores on every assistant token from the divergence turn onward, without the takeover in context. The repaired teacher is frozen as the sole scorer for standard OPD, requiring no task reward during repair or training. Across three environments, two teachers and four students, R2S outperforms three state-of-the-art agentic-OPD methods in all twelve teacher–student–environment cells, by 12.8 success points on average over the best of them in each cell.

Method

R2S pipeline. Left: the untrained student plays the environment; at a selected high-disagreement state the teacher takes over several times and a reward-free check selects one takeover. Middle: with the selected takeover in context, the frozen teacher scores the student's original thinking and action tokens from the divergence turn onward, giving the q+ targets. Right: a copy of the teacher is fine-tuned offline to produce these targets without the takeover and becomes the sole scorer of ordinary OPD.

R2S repairs the teacher's scores on the full assistant suffix before ordinary OPD. With a selected takeover from the untrained student's state in context, the frozen teacher T0 scores the student's thinking and actions from the divergence turn onward (q+). A copy learns these targets without the takeover and becomes the sole OPD scorer.

Results

R2S versus vanilla OPD, TCOD-F2B, Guided-OPD and FutureBridge. Success (%) of one training run per cell, mean ± std over three decodes of its final checkpoint. The best and second best of the five trained students in each column are highlighted; the teacher acting alone and the untrained student are anchors.

MethodALFWorldWebShopScienceWorld
Qwen3.5-9B teaches Qwen3.5-2B and Qwen3.5-4B
2B4B2B4B2B4B
Teacher alone63.1±1.733.5±0.332.0±1.8
Student alone15.1±1.843.4±1.017.6±1.133.7±0.93.1±0.428.0±1.5
Vanilla OPD58.0±2.465.8±2.635.7±1.634.6±2.923.7±2.034.6±3.5
TCOD-F2B62.7±2.059.6±1.533.1±0.535.1±0.928.0±2.630.6±0.7
Guided-OPD63.6±2.261.6±2.035.6±0.635.5±1.325.9±3.732.2±1.1
FutureBridge56.8±2.858.4±3.736.3±1.033.9±1.719.0±2.030.7±1.3
R2S (ours)77.9±1.381.9±2.457.9±1.655.9±1.437.9±0.647.8±3.0
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 teaches Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B
4B8B4B8B4B8B
Teacher alone42.3±1.12.9±0.332.9±3.2
Student alone30.4±2.346.9±0.815.5±1.223.6±1.29.0±1.424.0±3.9
Vanilla OPD41.2±1.744.5±2.624.7±1.120.3±0.938.0±1.236.8±1.0
TCOD-F2B42.6±1.148.8±1.822.8±0.723.4±0.738.4±0.934.9±0.5
Guided-OPD42.0±0.447.0±1.923.3±1.622.3±0.834.7±1.833.0±1.5
FutureBridge41.8±2.645.9±1.116.7±0.920.7±0.736.1±1.537.1±2.0
R2S (ours)54.5±1.454.7±1.028.5±0.630.4±1.245.8±1.450.5±1.4

Training Dynamics

Success over 150 training steps on ALFWorld, WebShop and ScienceWorld for vanilla OPD, TCOD-F2B, Guided-OPD, FutureBridge and R2S, with bands over three training runs; the R2S curve lies above every baseline from early in training, and above the dashed teacher-alone line.

R2S students separate from every baseline during training. Qwen3.5-9B teaches Qwen3.5-4B; mean ± one standard deviation over three training runs; dashed: the teacher acting alone.

What the Repair Changes

Left: KL from each teacher's top-16 scores to the takeover-informed targets on held-out states; the repaired teacher is closer in all three environments. Right: share of held-out episodes that run out of turns; the R2S student runs out of turns about half as often as the vanilla OPD student.

Repair moves the teacher toward its informed targets, and its student runs out of turns about half as often. Left: each teacher's top-16 KL to q+ on held-out states, with 95% goal-bootstrap intervals. Right: held-out episodes that end unfinished at the turn budget, mean ± std over three decodes.

Released Checkpoints

The 24 checkpoints of the main table, on the Hugging Face Hub as bf16 safetensors. The repaired teacher of a pair is the sole scorer that distilled that pair's student; the student is the final checkpoint of its 150-step run. The "Teacher alone" row of the table is the unrepaired base teacher.

Code and Models

BibTeX

@article{zhao2026capable,
  title={Capable Teacher, Myopic Scorer: Reward-Free Teacher Repair for Agentic On-Policy Distillation},
  author={Zhao, Shu and Yu, Tan},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2610.28586},
  year={2026}
}